Grok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5
A side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Claude Fable 5 — intelligence, context, capabilities, and price.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Streaming | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Web search | ||
| Vision (image input) | ||
| Document input | ||
| Video | ||
| Audio |
Grok 4.7 pricing
- Under 200K prompt tokens · Input$2.3 / 1M tokens
- Under 200K prompt tokens · Cached input$0.575 / 1M tokens
- Under 200K prompt tokens · Output$6.9 / 1M tokens
- 200K+ prompt tokens · Input$4.6 / 1M tokens
- 200K+ prompt tokens · Cached input$1.15 / 1M tokens
- 200K+ prompt tokens · Output$13.8 / 1M tokens
- Web search (when used)$5.75 / 1,000 calls
List prices plus 15%. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View Grok 4.7details →Claude Fable 5 pricing
- Input$11.5 / 1M tokens
- Cached input$1.15 / 1M tokens
- 5m cache write$14.375 / 1M tokens
- 1h cache write$23 / 1M tokens
- Output$57.5 / 1M tokens
- Web search (when used)$11.5 / 1,000 searchs
List prices plus 15%. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View Claude Fable 5details →Grok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5: FAQ
- Is Grok 4.7 better than Claude Fable 5?
- xAI's frontier model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work. Improves on Grok 4.6 across long-horizon coding and professional-work benchmarks at the same price and speed. Anthropic's previous top-end model for hard reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Scores 62 on the AA Intelligence Index v4.1, now succeeded by Fable 5.1 on both quality and cache pricing. The best choice depends on your workload — compare context window, capabilities, and price above, or try both on TryAI.
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Claude Fable 5?
- See the pricing rows above for live per-token or per-generation costs. TryAI bills both from one pay-as-you-go balance.