Grok 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5
A side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.6 and Claude Fable 5 — intelligence, context, capabilities, and price.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Streaming | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Web search | ||
| Vision (image input) | ||
| Document input | ||
| Video | ||
| Audio |
Grok 4.6 pricing
- Under 200K prompt tokens · Input$2 / 1M tokens
- Under 200K prompt tokens · Cached input$0.5 / 1M tokens
- Under 200K prompt tokens · Output$6 / 1M tokens
- 200K+ prompt tokens · Input$4 / 1M tokens
- 200K+ prompt tokens · Cached input$1 / 1M tokens
- 200K+ prompt tokens · Output$12 / 1M tokens
- Web search (when used)$5 / 1,000 calls
Provider-equivalent rates. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View Grok 4.6details →Claude Fable 5 pricing
- Input$10 / 1M tokens
- Cached input$1 / 1M tokens
- 5m cache write$12.5 / 1M tokens
- 1h cache write$20 / 1M tokens
- Output$50 / 1M tokens
- Web search (when used)$10 / 1,000 searchs
Provider-equivalent rates. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View Claude Fable 5details →Grok 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5: FAQ
- Is Grok 4.6 better than Claude Fable 5?
- xAI's frontier model for long-running agents, codebase work, and ambitious interactive or visual projects. Scores 61 on the AA Intelligence Index with 500K context and always-on reasoning. Anthropic's highest-capability model for the hardest reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Scores 62 on the AA Intelligence Index v4.1, just behind Opus 5 at max effort. The best choice depends on your workload — compare context window, capabilities, and price above, or try both on TryAI.
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Claude Fable 5?
- See the pricing rows above for live per-token or per-generation costs. TryAI bills both from one pay-as-you-go balance.