DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.2
A side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM-5.2 — intelligence, context, capabilities, and price.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Streaming | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Web search | ||
| Vision (image input) | ||
| Document input | ||
| Video | ||
| Audio |
DeepSeek V4 Pro pricing
- Input$1.74 / 1M tokens
- Cached input$0.145 / 1M tokens
- Output$3.48 / 1M tokens
Provider-equivalent rates. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View DeepSeek V4 Prodetails →GLM-5.2 pricing
- Input$1.4 / 1M tokens
- Cached input$0.14 / 1M tokens
- Output$4.4 / 1M tokens
Provider-equivalent rates. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View GLM-5.2details →DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.2: FAQ
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than GLM-5.2?
- Flagship open-source MoE (1.6T) — frontier reasoning + coding with a 1M-token context, at open-weights pricing. Zhipu's GLM-5.2 — the leading open-weights model on the AA Intelligence Index. The best choice depends on your workload — compare context window, capabilities, and price above, or try both on TryAI.
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM-5.2?
- See the pricing rows above for live per-token or per-generation costs. TryAI bills both from one pay-as-you-go balance.