Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5
A side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Fable 5 — intelligence, context, capabilities, and price.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Streaming | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Web search | ||
| Vision (image input) | ||
| Document input | ||
| Video | ||
| Audio |
Claude Fable 5.1 pricing
- Input$10 / 1M tokens
- Cached input$0.25 / 1M tokens
- 5m cache write$12.5 / 1M tokens
- 1h cache write$20 / 1M tokens
- Output$50 / 1M tokens
- Web search (when used)$10 / 1,000 searchs
Provider-equivalent rates. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View Claude Fable 5.1details →Claude Fable 5 pricing
- Input$10 / 1M tokens
- Cached input$1 / 1M tokens
- 5m cache write$12.5 / 1M tokens
- 1h cache write$20 / 1M tokens
- Output$50 / 1M tokens
- Web search (when used)$10 / 1,000 searchs
Provider-equivalent rates. Higher reasoning can use more output tokens. TryAI charges a one-credit minimum and rounds each run's aggregate cost up once.
View Claude Fable 5details →Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5: FAQ
- Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Claude Fable 5?
- Anthropic's newest frontier model for coding, knowledge work, and long-horizon agentic runs. Beats both Fable 5 and Opus 5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (55.8%), CursorBench 3.2 (73.4%), and Humanity's Last Exam (65.0% with tools), at 75% cheaper cache reads than Fable 5. Anthropic's previous top-end model for hard reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Scores 62 on the AA Intelligence Index v4.1, now succeeded by Fable 5.1 on both quality and cache pricing. The best choice depends on your workload — compare context window, capabilities, and price above, or try both on TryAI.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Fable 5?
- See the pricing rows above for live per-token or per-generation costs. TryAI bills both from one pay-as-you-go balance.